I have eaten
the plums
that were in
the icebox
and which
you were probably
saving
for breakfast
Forgive me
they were delicious
so sweet
and so cold
-- William Carlos Williams
I have eaten
the plums
that were in
the icebox
and which
you were probably
saving
for breakfast
Forgive me
they were delicious
so sweet
and so cold
-- William Carlos Williams
…a sort of reticence in meta-language, in the great metaphysical and/or philosophical systems… responsible, perhaps, for something in the way that ancient and modern Chinese have of explaining their problems, which often is disconcerting to us.
Rather than proceeding to an explanation which, for us, is the only logical one – which seeks the causes, makes the deductions, specifies the motivations, appearance and essences, and at the same time foresees the consequences of an event – an operation which derives from the principle of a logical, metaphysical causality – the Chinese give us a ‘structuralist’ or ‘warring’ (contradictory) portrait. Behind the event itself there appears a combination or an association that bears the seed of the overthrow of the previous order; a battle between good and evil, two-faced people, persecutions, conspiracies, sensational turns of event.
As if the causal, deterministic, metaphysical logic had crumbled before the traumatic occurrence whose advent we question, but without losing the symbolic level, the Chinese-speaking individual describes this event as if he were speaking of a game, a war, a combinatorium… an aesthetic mode of reasoning… By eliminating straight away the problem of an objective truth, it shifts people to a symbolic situation.
--Julia Kristeva, About Chinese Women
How do you describe people who dont think - the scientist, essentially, the person who just wants to grasp the nutshell and not to lean into the infinite abyss...?
An expansion out from from the neat confines of a perfectly epitomised meaning is the natural movement of thought. As Conrad writes in Heart of Darkness: 'The yarns of seamen have a direct simplicity, the whole meaning of which lies within the shell of a cracked nut. But [...] [to Marlow] the meaning of an episode was not inside like a kernel but outside, enveloping the tale which brought it out only as a glow brings out a haze, in the likeness of one of these misty halos that sometimes are made visible by the spectral illumination of moonshine'. [....] It is easy to misconstrue this idea of space and place, as suggested in Hamlet's words: 'I could be bounded in a nutshell, and count myself a king of infinite space', and W.S. Graham wrote in a letter that poetry must not 'hand us out a little nutshell truth which we have pleasure in agreeing with'. [...] The 'bad dreams' which counteract this happy illusion for Hamlet are his awakening into consciousness, an escape into the external; in this way, poetry is like a flurry of bad dreams; brooding in the 'nutshell' that metaphor might imply, is the bad dream of instability in extended, infinite space. Paterson's concept of metaphor as creating 'a new unity in the language' is of a unity brought about by drawing attention to the disunity of everyday literal and metaphorical language. It is an act of understanding created out of exposing the limiting enclosure of the firmament, similar to D.H. Lawrence's concept of the mind's umbrella. [...]
There's no vocabulary
For love within a family, love that's lived in
But not looked at, love within the light of which
All else is seen, the love within which
All other love finds speech.
This love is silent.
--T.S. Eliot